faculty:denton:paperreview
Comments on Paper Reviewing
Dr. Denton outlined a few guidelines for reviewing papers properly.
- Conflict of Interest - must be reported and lead to the rejection of the reviewing
- A reviewer has always the option to decline the reviewing of a paper for undisclosed reasons
- Importance of quality - Comments and suggestions made to the authors of a paper must be correct and sound
- Don't get carried away - Rather than commenting on how something should be done, comment on how clearly or sound things are that were done
- Summarize - the first few sentences of a review should summarize the paper, its approach, etc. to show the authors that the paper was read and to show the editor and authors that the paper was understood
- Do not focus on grammar and spelling - You are not supposed to review the paper because of your English expertise, but because of your domain expertise
- Corrections - When suggesting corrections, focus on formulae and figures
Domain Expertise
- Correctness of figures
- Correctness of formulas and math
- Sufficient experimental details
faculty/denton/paperreview.txt · Last modified: 2017/01/13 17:03 by localadmin